|
Team
Collaboration |
The
co-operation in the group was poor. They didn't
interact at all |
The
co-operation in the group wasn't
good. The participation in research work was not the same
neither the contributions to the
presentation. |
The
co-operation in the team was quite good. All members of the
team participated in the research and contributed
in gathering and recording information. |
co-operation
between team members was Excellent. All team members
have participated in the research and contributed to
presenting the information (Creating the
presentation) |
|
|
How
the
Information
has
been treated |
The
information wasn’
selected
properly .
Mistakes
in main ideas selection. Quite a lot of activities are
not solved accurately |
The
information has been reviewed, but there wasn’t
a commitment in time to select it properly. Some
irrelevant information.. |
The
information was understood correctly, but it wasn’t
selected in the right way...
evidence of accurate research |
Relevant
information is gathered and recorded ,
it
has been reviewed properly it was understood and selected in
the right way. |
|
|
Final
presentation |
Lacked
creativity and did not introduce new ideas. The organization
of contents is not clear. The design is not very good:
colours, images, texts. |
Presentation
of content is not clear . Some activities completed but not
according to the proposed model. Little
creativity. |
Has
solved activities according to proposed model, sometimes
is creative and introduces new ideas. Information is mostly
well organised. |
Is
creative and introduces new ideas of high quality that can be
seen in the final product It's designed with high quality
standards: colours, images, texts. |
|